n8n vs Zapier

Zapier charges per-task, metered monthly. n8n is open source and self-hosted.

The short answer

If your automation volume is growing, n8n replaces a bill that scales with usage with a server that costs the same at 10,000 runs as at 100. If you run a handful of automations, Zapier is cheaper than your own time.

Adopt now203kCustom / check the LICENSE fileUpdated todayfull n8n verdict →

Pick n8n when

  • Your per-task bill has started growing faster than your revenue.
  • An automation touches data you would rather not hand to a third party.
  • You want a step that runs arbitrary code, not just a pre-built connector.
  • Someone on the team is comfortable running a Docker container.

Stay with Zapier when

  • You have fewer than ~20 automations and they rarely change.
  • Nobody on the team wants to own uptime for a workflow engine.
  • You need an obscure SaaS connector that only the incumbent has built.

The migration cost nobody mentions

Workflows do not port automatically — you rebuild each one. Budget an afternoon per non-trivial automation, and expect the long tail of error handling to take longer than the happy path.

We deliberately do not quote Zapier's prices — third-party pricing changes without notice and a stale number is worse than none. The pricing model is what determines whether self-hosting wins, and that is stated above. Check current pricing with the vendor.

Which of these is already in your stack?

Paste your GitHub URL. We read your actual dependencies and tell you what is abandoned, what is licence-risky, and what is worth swapping. Free, no signup.

Repository facts from the public GitHub API. This is NoizeOff's editorial comparison for a team of 2–20, not advice from either vendor, and not legal advice on licensing. We are not affiliated with Zapier.

All comparisons · Adoption Radar · Home